02158nas a2200229 4500008004100000245010300041210006900144260003900213490000900252520137700261653001001638653002801648653003801676653002401714653001901738653001801757653002301775653001601798100001601814700002901830856006901859 2019 eng d00aImpact of simulated polar night on Antarctic mixotrophic and strict photoautotrophic phytoplankton0 aImpact of simulated polar night on Antarctic mixotrophic and str aOxford, OHbMiami Universityc20180 vM.S.3 a

Phytoplankton in polar regions experience long periods of continuous darkness annually during the polar night. Due to difficulties in performing field work during this period, it is largely unknown how phytoplankton endure this extreme transition from 24-hour daylight in the fall to several months of total darkness in the austral winter. The primary goal of this study was to compare physiological and photosynthetic responses of several Antarctic phytoplankton of variable trophic abilities (pure photosynthetic vs. mixotrophic) to simulated polar night conditions, including the transition seasons before and after winter. Two distinct responses were observed to extended darkness: (1) strict photoautotrophs (Chlamydomonas sp. ICE-MDV and Chlamydomonas sp. UWO241) exhibited functional downregulation their photosynthetic processes in the winter, followed by a lag phase of several days during mimicked spring, and (2) mixotrophs (Isochrysis sp. MDV and Geminigera cryophila) maintained functional photosynthetic apparatus, increased heterotrophy through the winter, and exhibited immediate growth upon return to light incubation. These differing responses to mimicked polar night conditions could represent two different strategies for surviving the long period of darkness in the phytoplankton’s natural environment.

10aalgae10aAntarctic phytoplankton10achlorophyll fluorescence analysis10aMcMurdo Dry Valleys10aPhotosynthesis10aphytoplankton10apolar microbiology10apolar night1 aCariani, ZE1 aMorgan-Kiss, Rachael, M. uhttp://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1547204599969081