Skip to main content
McMurdo Dry Valleys LTER
Code of Conduct
MCM LTER Logos
Browse by Category
Find Stream Field Notes
Streams Field Manual
Real Time Data Dashboards
Adams Stream at M1
Canada Stream at F1
Lawson Creek at B3
Lost Seal Stream at F3
Miers Stream at M2
Onyx River at Lake Vanda
Onyx River at Lower Wright
Lake Observing Platforms
East Lake Bonney
West Lake Bonney
Data Explorer Dashboard
Glacier Stakes Map
Soil Projects Map
Education and Outreach
E&O Activities Submission Form
You are here
Diurnal Effects on Soil Biota
Investigation of the effect of short-term variation in soil moisture and soil temperature on nematode anhydrobiosis as part of the McMurdo Dry Valleys Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) project. The percent of anhydrobiotic nematodes with relation to soil moisture and temperature was determined.
The study began at 0930 on 22 December 1997 and ended on 23 December 1997. The samples were taken at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hrs.
December 22, 1997
December 23, 1997
Wall, D., Virginia, R.A.
Diurnal Effects on Soil Biota
Environmental Data Initiative. DOI:
Dataset accessed 12 June 2021.
Here are the details of the actual data columns, including labels, definitions, codes and scientific units used. The actual ancillary diurnal effects on soil biota data (and spreadsheet) is not large, and quite manageable.
Variables (click to expand):
Name of area where measurement was made
Date on which sample was gathered
TYPE OF ORGANISM
Family associated with organism
Species found in soil
Gender of organism (male vs. female)
Survival Status (living, dead, or both)
Maturity (adult, juvenile, or both)
TOTAL (#/KG DRY SOIL)
Number of organisms found in that category
#/KG DRY SOIL
Name of file in which data was stored
or query the dataset by variables and dates of interest:
Ross A. Virginia
McMurdo Dry Valleys LTER
Inigo San Gil
The use of anhydrobiosis by soil nematodes in the Antarctic Dry Valleys
Soil was collected five times over a 24-hour period from four adjacent 1m2 plots on the south side of Lake Hoare, beginning at 0930 on 22 December 1997. Soil samples were taken for organism enumeration and moisture content analysis as follows: Sampling bags were prepared with one sterile 'Whirlpak' bag and clean plastic scoop per sample. Samples were taken from within the 10 cm diameter circular area of each plot. Using the plastic scoop, soil was collected to 10 cm depth. Very large rocks (>20 mm diameter) were excluded from the sample. The soil was shoveled into the 'Whirlpak' bag until three quarters full (about 1.5 kg soil). The soil was mixed well in the bag, then the bag was closed tightly, expelling as much air as possible. The soil samples were stored in a cooler for transportation. On return to the laboratory (within 8 hours of sampling), the soils were stored at 4C until further processing.
In the laboratory, soil samples were handled in a laminar flow hood to prevent contamination. The Whirlpak bags of soil were mixed thoroughly prior to opening. Approximately 200cm3 of soil was placed in a pre-weighed 800mL plastic beaker. Rocks greater than 3-4mm in diameter were removed from the sample. A sub-sample of approximately 50g was removed and placed in a pre-weighed aluminum dish, and weighed on a balance accurate to 0.01g. This sample was dried at 105C for 24 hours. The sample was removed, placed in desiccator to cool down, and re-weighed. These data were used to calculate water content of the soil and to express data as numbers of soil organisms per unit dry weight of soil.
The remaining soil in the plastic beaker was weighed. Cold tap water was added up to 650 mL. The soil suspension was stirred carefully (star stir or figure of 8) for 30 seconds, using a spatula. Immediately the liquid was poured into wet screens - a stack of 40 mesh on top of a 400 mesh. The screens were rinsed gently with ice cold tap water (from a wash bottle) through the top of the stack, keeping the screens at an angle as the water filtered through. The water was kept on ice at all times. The top screen was removed, and the lower screen rinsed top down, never directly on top of the soil, but at the top of the screen and from behind. The water was allowed to cascade down and carry the particles into the bottom wedge of the angled screen. The side of the screen was tapped gently to filter all the water through. The suspension was rinsed from the front and the back, keeping the screen at an angle and not allowing the wat r to overflow the edge of the screen. The soil particles were backwashed into a 50mL plastic centrifuge tube, tipping the screen into the funnel above the tube and rinsing the funnel gently. The suspension was centrifuged for five minutes at 1744 RPM. The liquid was decanted, leaving a few mL on top of the soil particles. The tube was filled with sucrose solution (454g sucrose per liter of tap water, kept refrigerated) up to 45mL. This was stirred gently with a spatula until the pellet was broken up and suspended. The suspension was centrifuged for one minute at 1744 RPM, decanted into a wet 500 mesh screen, rinsed well with ice cold tap water and backwashed into a centrifuge tube. Samples were refrigerated at 5C until counted.
Samples were washed in to a counting dish and examined under a microscope at x10 or x20 magnification. Rotifers and tardigrades were identified and counted. Nematodes were identified to species and sex, and counted. Total numbers in each sample were recorded on data sheets. All species of nematode, and all rotifers and tardigrades found in the sample were recorded. Data were entered in to Excel files, printed, and checked for errors.
This file was created by Pilar Tillberg on 9 May 2001, using raw data from the Excel workbook '9712diwo.raw'. The file format was suggested by the LTER data manager, to conform with the relational database structure. [PT 10 May 2001].